.png)
In the ever-growing conversation surrounding environmental sustainability, two terms often thrown around interchangeably are "biodegradable" and "natural." However, a closer examination reveals that these terms are not synonymous and should be used with precision, particularly in industries like erosion control where material choices play a crucial role. Let's delve into the distinctions between these terms and why precision matters.
The Vocabulary Divergence
1. Biodegradable: The Overused Misnomer
The term "biodegradable" has become ubiquitous in eco-conscious conversations. From packaging materials to consumer goods, everything seems to be labeled as such. However, this catch-all term is often misleading. Technically, almost everything is biodegradable, given enough time. This makes the term too broad and, in some cases, even misleading.
According to a study by the University of Plymouth1, even seemingly durable materials like plastics labeled as biodegradable take decades or even centuries to break down so although still "biodegradable" misleading to say the least.
2. The Need for Precision: Rapid Degradability vs. Biodegradability
To enhance clarity, it's essential to distinguish between biodegradability and rapid degradability. While all materials will eventually break down, rapid degradability implies a significantly shorter decomposition timeline. Precision in language is vital, especially when the environmental impact is a concern.
A report from the Ellen MacArthur Foundation2 notes that "precise language in waste management", such as distinguishing between compostable and biodegradable, helps prevent contamination and supports effective recycling.
The Erosion Control Conundrum
1. Natural vs. Biodegradable in Erosion Control
In the erosion control industry, the distinction between natural and biodegradable is particularly crucial. "Natural" signifies materials derived from nature, whereas "biodegradable" merely implies eventual decomposition. Using the terms interchangeably can lead to misconceptions, especially when specific material requirements are at stake.
For example, consider Straw Wattles, commonly used in erosion control. A biodegradable wattle may contain plastic, while a natural wattle uses materials like burlap for optimal biodegradability.
2. Straw Wattles Case Study: Choosing Wisely
When selecting erosion control materials, understanding the nuances between biodegradable and natural is paramount. Opting for a fully natural wattle ensures that the product is not only biodegradable but also aligned with eco-friendly principles.
Environmental Impact: According to a study published in the Journal of Environmental Management3, erosion control measures incorporating natural materials demonstrate a lower environmental impact over their lifecycle compared to those with synthetic components.
Conclusion: Precision for a Sustainable Future
In summary, the language we use matters, especially in the context of environmental sustainability. As the erosion control industry and other sectors seek eco-friendly solutions, precision in terminology is crucial. When a project calls for "biodegradable," it's essential to clarify whether it means rapid degradability or the use of natural materials. Let's embrace precision and make informed choices for a more sustainable future.
References:
Thompson, R. C., et al. (2009). Plastics, the environment and human health: current consensus and future trends. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 364(1526), 2153–2166.
Ellen MacArthur Foundation. (2019). The New Plastics Economy - Catalysing Action.
Kondolf, G. M., et al. (2017). Erosion of natural and anthropogenic landscapes in the context of contemporary global change. Journal of Environmental Management, 200, 56–79.